Filter Company News
Subscribe
  • EmptyBox

    With regard to testifying in criminal cases, research suggests that defendants are “damned if they do, damned if they don’t.”  When defendants choose not to testify, judges often instruct juries not to conclude anything (e.g., guilt) from their choice not to testify.  Studies have shown, however, that limiting instructions actually have a boomerang effect in which they make more salient a defendant’s lack of testimony (Antonio & Arone, 2005; Jones & Harrison, 2009).  Thus the choice not to testify, despite judicial instructions, influences how jurors perceive defendants.

    ...

    Read Full Article >
  • Juror pledges may be the next best step in the pursuit of a viable solution to the problem of jurors using the internet to research cases.

    Judge Shira A. Scheindlin (US v. Viktor Bout, 2011) turned to jurors’ pledges to stop jurors from researching cases online. Her hope was that having jurors sign pledges promising not to research a case online (or elsewhere) would make their oaths more salient and stop jurors from conducting online research. It probably did not hurt that those who signed the pledge faced perjury charges if they did not honor it.

    No one knows whether a written pledge will keep jurors more faithful than an oral one....

    Read Full Article >
  • Caravaggio's Narcissus

    In this age of Facebook, Twitter, email, and text messaging, jurors are better “plugged-in” to each other and the world than ever before. But are they really more concerned with each other and the social world around them? New research suggests that, despite our newfound tools for staying connected with others, Americans are actually becoming more self-centered, more narcissistic, less civically engaged, and less interested in effecting change.

    These trends were foretold by Harvard professor Robert Putnam in his 1995 essay, Bowling Alone: America’s...

    Read Full Article >
  • DOAR congratulates William Savitt and the entire trial team at Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz on their excellent work and well-deserved win on behalf of their client, Vulcan Materials. DOAR supported the victory in another closely watched M&A-related trial in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The case, in which certain confidential materials intended for use during an initial friendly exchange were then misused when Marietta pursued a hostile takeover, was one that had not been seen before in Delaware or anywhere else in the United States.  Martin Marietta and...

    Read Full Article >
1 18 19 20