The Complaint: Trade Secret Misappropriation Alleged by a Payment Technology Company

In a trade secret case filed in federal court, the plaintiff, a payment technology company, alleged that former senior executives misappropriated proprietary information before their termination. The complaint alleged that the executives downloaded extensive company data shortly before leaving the company, including business documents, customer information, and other confidential materials. Additionally, one executive allegedly retained company-issued equipment containing proprietary source code.

Within a year after leaving the plaintiff company, the former executives established a new company in direct competition. The defendants’ company developed a payment platform that allegedly incorporated and mimicked key features of the plaintiff’s software. Though the defendants did not publicly disclose these features on their company website, they offered some for free or at heavily discounted rates. The defendant’s company also allegedly targeted the plaintiff’s customer base and hired several key employees from the plaintiff’s company, including engineers who had worked on the original software platform.

The Ask: A Payment Systems Expert with Technical and Trade Secret Experience

The plaintiff approached DOAR to provide an expert with deep technical expertise in software development and platform architecture. They sought an expert with a master’s degree or higher in computer science, cryptography, or mathematics/statistics, with strong capabilities in analyzing web and mobile applications. They also wanted an expert with comprehensive knowledge of software development, including front-end and back-end technologies, and database systems experience.

Beyond technical expertise, the expert should have experience in trade secret litigation, software disputes, and testifying in depositions or trials. The expert would be asked to perform forensic analysis, including identifying file activity, such as timestamps, transfers, and modifications, to support the case’s evidentiary needs. The complexity of this case required someone who could analyze competing software platforms for potential misappropriation while clearly explaining technical concepts to non-technical audiences.

Experience testifying in federal court was particularly valuable given the venue and nature of the dispute. While not a primary requirement, familiarity with the logistics industry would provide helpful context for understanding the business environment and software applications.

How DOAR Was Able to Meet the Expert Need

DOAR actively recruited a diverse group of leading experts to support our clients in anticipation of an influx of financial technology disputes. For this case, DOAR recommended an expert with both the advanced technical credentials and litigation experience required for this case. The expert holds a Ph.D. in Computer Science and brings over 20 years of experience in software development and systems architecture. His background included deep technical knowledge of software platforms and development frameworks, and experience performing forensic analyses of file activities and data transfers.

As a seasoned expert witness, he has testified in multiple software trade secret disputes, participating in both depositions and trials. His combined expertise in software architecture and forensic analysis enabled him to evaluate the technical implementation of competing platforms and investigate the alleged transfer of proprietary information.

The expert’s academic and industry experience positioned him to bridge complex technical concepts with legal requirements, making him particularly effective at analyzing competing software platforms while clearly explaining findings to non-technical audiences. His background in evaluating software architectures and development processes provided the necessary foundation for analyzing the potential misappropriation of trade secrets in this case.

How DOAR’s Experts Can Assist in Trade Secret Disputes

DOAR represents experts across technology and life sciences industries, creating specialized teams to address evolving litigation needs in these sectors. Our expertise spans a range of matters, including trade secrets, patent infringement, antitrust disputes, breach of contract, and securities. In trade secret cases specifically, whether involving source code, data analysis, manufacturing processes, or scientific innovations, DOAR’s experts provide the critical insights and clarity required for high-stakes disputes.

Contact us to learn more about DOAR’s testifying experts or to explore our expert teams across the technology and life sciences industries.

Stay Informed
Stay up to date on our latest news and insights.
Subscribe
Read More
car headlights blurred in the darkness
Case Study
Sep 3, 2025
Engineering Experts Needed for Automotive Antitrust Dispute

Counsel sought testifying experts who could clearly explain complex automotive engineering concepts and provide insight into how design and development decisions are made within the industry.

Read Now
grey and light blue colors resembling the sky and clouds
Case Study
Aug 1, 2025
UAV Expert Needed for Patent Dispute Involving System Configuration and Design

DOAR provided a UAV expert with extensive aerospace engineering experience to evaluate both the technical and visual claims.

Read Now
black and white facade of building windows
Case Study
Jul 7, 2025
Trading Systems Expert Needed for Intellectual Property Dispute

A major U.S. securities exchange asserted patent and trade secret claims over electronic order-routing and execution systems.

Read Now
entry way of a bank vault
Case Study
Jun 13, 2025
Banking Enforcement Expert Needed for Shareholder Derivative Dispute

Alleged systemic oversight failures at a large financial institution prompted the need for expert insight on banking enforcement practices.

Read Now
semiconductor technology, multi colored technology chips
Case Study
May 20, 2025
Supply Chain Expert Needed for Semiconductor Patent Dispute

In a semiconductor patent dispute involving power management chips, the defendant was accused of using patented technology.

Read Now
interior of car, black leather seats
Case Study
Apr 30, 2025
An Automotive Industry Economist Needed for a Certified Used Vehicle Dispute

DOAR provided an automotive economics expert with deep experience in regulatory analysis, consumer behavior, and market forecasting.

Read Now
yellow and white liquid separating creating wholes between the elements
Case Study
Apr 11, 2025
Pharmaceutical Formulation Expert Needed for Breach of Contract and Trade Secret Litigation

DOAR provided a pharmaceutical formulation expert with deep experience in injectable drugs and scale-up processes.

Read Now
close up of a moody grey telecommunications phone tower with grey sky
Case Study
Mar 18, 2025
Wireless Communications Expert Needed for PTAB Proceedings

A technology company petitioned for IPR proceedings to challenge the validity of two wireless communications patents.

Read Now