In the courtroom, how information is delivered can be as important as the information itself. DOAR’s evidence presentation team ensures exhibits, demonstratives, and video designations, testimony, and other impeachment materials are displayed clearly, consistently, and in a way that supports the flow of the case.
As an extension of the trial team, our consultants manage the full scope of technical and logistical demands—from preparing and displaying evidence to adapting quickly to shifts during examination. With extensive experience across lengthy trials and complex hearings, we understand courtroom dynamics, anticipate counsel’s needs, and maintain steady control over the presentation environment. DOAR is recognized nationwide for its experienced, highly regarded evidence presentation consultants whose work keeps the jury’s and judge’s focus where it belongs: on the substance of the case.
We manage courtroom technology from coordination to setup to operation, tailoring our approach to each venue. Whether supporting a one-day hearing or a multi-week trial or arbitrations, we ensure all visual and technical elements function reliably without interruption.
We are consultants, not button pushers. We collaborate with trial teams to shape the witness sequence and anticipate how each examination builds the case narrative. Our preparation and organization of exhibits and case materials ensure every witness contributes meaningfully to the story the jury hears.
Our consultants observe courtroom dynamics and provide timely feedback on how evidence is being received, helping teams refine the delivery of information throughout the trial.
Success at the ITC depends not just on the legal merits, but on how effectively parties can organize technical complexity, align expert-driven narratives, and present a clear, disciplined case under significant time pressure. Let’s explore how venue nuances and current industry trends are impacting proceedings seen before the Commission.
To better understand evolving trends at the venue and hear directly from those involved in ITC litigation, DOAR proudly sponsored and attended the American Conference Institute’s annual ITC Litigation and Enforcement Conference.
Five-year analysis finds gender, socioeconomic status, and perceived case strength shape how jurors evaluate liability.
Following a bench trial in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, the court entered final judgment in favor of SiriusXM, holding that Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft’s patent infringement claims were barred by equitable estoppel. DOAR supported defense counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP with an integrated approach encompassing strategic advising, graphics consulting, and evidence presentation.
National survey highlights strong support for AI safety guardrails and reveals generational differences in attitudes toward chatbot accountability.
Drawing on years of psycho-legal research and real-world courtroom experience, Dr. Gordon examines what the Luigi Mangione case reveals about modern jurors—from the influence of pretrial publicity and pop-culture narratives to the ways emotion, bias, and broader societal mistrust shape verdicts inside the jury room.
This marks a new chapter for DOAR, reinforcing its role as the proven experts in litigation strategy for leading lawyers involved in complex, bet-the-company litigation.
DOAR is proud to have supported the plaintiffs and their counsel at Winston & Strawn LLP in this significant victory for immigrants whose civil rights and due process protections were violated.