Proven Experts in Litigation Strategy

Using litigation data across carriers, infrastructure providers, device manufacturers, and technology suppliers, we highlight where different types of disputes tend to arise and why those patterns vary by segment.

For litigators, especially in insurance disputes with their endless exhibits and dense policy language, the challenge is not whether to use graphics but how to use them effectively, credibly, and strategically to make the case intelligible to the trier of fact.

Drawing on years of psycho-legal research and real-world courtroom experience, Dr. Gordon examines what the Luigi Mangione case reveals about modern jurors—from the influence of pretrial publicity and pop-culture narratives to the ways emotion, bias, and broader societal mistrust shape verdicts inside the jury room.

DOAR supported Foley Hoag in the Channel One Russia Worldwide Case, which resulted in a $4.5M jury verdict after a complex SDNY trial.

This marks a new chapter for DOAR, reinforcing its role as the proven experts in litigation strategy for leading lawyers involved in complex, bet-the-company litigation.

As technology transforms what is possible in juror research, the gap between available tools and permissible practices continues to widen, particularly with respect to social media.

Using aggregated filing data from the wireless dataset, we provide a data-driven view of where litigation is concentrated, which parties are most active, and how the structure of the wireless market shapes the legal landscape.

State rules can dramatically alter what experts must disclose before trial and what they’re allowed to say during it. Let’s examine the spectrum of these guidelines and how they shift by location.