"*" indicates required fields
Success at the ITC depends not just on the legal merits, but on how effectively parties can organize technical complexity, align expert-driven narratives, and present a clear, disciplined case under significant time pressure. Let’s explore how venue nuances and current industry trends are impacting proceedings seen before the Commission.
The South Carolina Supreme Court's decision to overturn Alex Murdaugh's murder convictions has reignited questions about juror impartiality, outside influence, and the safeguards courts use to ensure a fair trial. DOAR Director Chad Lackey, Ph.D. explains what the reversal means for attorneys, how juror bias is identified and addressed, and why a multi-faceted approach to jury selection remains critical in today's highly connected world.
DOAR supported Empery Asset Management and Brio Capital in a Section 16(b) defense verdict involving Kartoon Studios.
Litigation surrounding autonomous vehicle technology raises a question that courts will increasingly confront as AI becomes more embedded in everyday life: when humans and machines share control, who gets the blame when something goes wrong?
A federal jury returned a sweeping victory in favor of former bank executive Patrick Byrne in his dispute against Ameris Bank.
To better understand evolving trends at the venue and hear directly from those involved in ITC litigation, DOAR proudly sponsored and attended the American Conference Institute’s annual ITC Litigation and Enforcement Conference.
Our new in-depth judge report, ITC ALJ Spotlight: Administrative Law Judge Monica Bhattacharyya, features expanded data and analysis of ALJ Bhattacharyya’s activity at this specialized venue.
Five-year analysis finds gender, socioeconomic status, and perceived case strength shape how jurors evaluate liability.