Attorneys all know that the role of an expert witness in litigation can be crucial; expert testimony can add credibility to arguments, refute the opposing counsel’s position, and reinforce the legal team’s believability in court. Particularly today, expert testimony has reached a new pinnacle in modern litigation. Given the complexity of the subject matter in most sizable litigation matters, more and more attention is being paid to experts’ credibility and persuasiveness at trial.

Too often, law firms relegate finding experts to “search” firms who send over a stack of CVs with the expectation of finding an expert that is “good enough” for a case. Not only is that inefficient, but also problematic. It can create challenges to the reliability of expert testimony if experts are not adequately evaluated (not to mention, create questions on the admissibility of expert testimony given the forthcoming amendments to Rule 702). Is this a gamble that attorneys can afford to make?

When considering how to represent their clients’ best interests, attorneys would be wise to pay close attention to the experts they retain. After all, an expert’s reputation, expertise, education, and experience can have a significant impact on the outcome of a case.

Furthermore, consulting with the best experts gives counsel an added opportunity to gain valuable insight into burgeoning markets that can drive a law firm’s bottom line. For example, gaming, fintech, telecom, and automotive technology innovations are rapidly advancing; each market’s players are engaged in fierce competition in a push to deliver innovation that converges across industries.

With so much at stake, attorneys should pay attention to the quality of experts they retain and put their trust in a company with highly-credentialed academics and industry insiders, and legal professionals who know the challenges of litigation and what it takes to be a successful expert witness.

Here are five factors attorneys should consider when they have an expert witness need:

  1. Reliable, subject-matter experts – It’s important to know your experts beyond what is highlighted in their CVs to ensure they are the best fit for a case. Working with a company dedicated to proactively researching qualified experts in areas where litigation is likely to ensue, and actively fostering relationships with only the best experts in their field, will improve the strength of your expert testimony in a case. The company would have prequalified experts and can answer questions such as:
    • Does the expert’s subject knowledge directly relate to the issues of the case, where they can speak intelligently and with authority on the matter?
    • Do they have experience testifying, teaching, or public speaking that qualifies them as good communicators on often complex issues?
    • Do they have any Daubert challenges or other potential liabilities that should be considered?
    • Do they have any conflicts that would preclude them from retention or damage their credibility?

Instead of sending over CVs that broadly meet search criteria, the company focuses on identifying the best experts and recommends a select one or two for each role who are best suited to address the need.

  1. Skilled professionals who understand the nature of litigation – When it comes to prequalifying experts, having former practicing attorneys, experts, and other legal professionals at the helm can give you a competitive edge. The company you partner with for experts would serve as an extension of your legal team with consultants who know the legal world, understand how to utilize experts for different venues best, and can advise you on the best-suited experts to enhance your case strategy.
  1. A company with a specific focus on litigation trends – When you need an expert you can trust to understand the issues in emerging areas of litigation, it’s critical that you partner with a company that specializes in identifying growing areas of conflict and follows the trends. The company’s mission is to anticipate the issues and proactively assemble diverse groups of expert teams who can address them in future litigation.
  1. Skilled project managers to liaise with – Having a trained professional to manage your expert witness needs for a matter and the relationship with a retained expert is crucial, particularly when the case is complex. Additionally, a project manager, in conjunction with other expert consultants from the company, can provide your legal team with an objective perspective on the need for additional experts to address different angles of your argument.
  1. An insider’s perspective into an area your law firm is looking to explore – Perhaps the most overlooked, yet very impactful, way to gain insight into an industry is through consultation with an expert. The expert can provide a look under the covers at developing issues in trending areas that informs your client acquisition efforts and litigation strategies. The expert can also be tapped for pitches to help clients understand how to stay competitive in their respective spaces.

In summary, attorneys cannot afford to go with experts who are “good enough.” More than ever, choosing the right expert is critical to adding credibility to arguments and helping counsel drive opportunities for firms. Having the right partner for the best experts by your side will put attorneys one step ahead of the game.

At DOAR, we have redefined the expert witness industry by bringing experts in the highest demand together under one virtual roof. By anticipating major trends in litigation, DOAR proactively builds teams consisting of academic and industry experts who have the credentials and experience to address our clients’ needs. We focus on areas involving automotive technology, fintech, gaming, and wireless communications, and many of our experts are pioneers in innovative technologies. Contact us to learn more about how our consulting and testifying experts can help your firm.

Stay Informed
Stay up to date on our latest news and insights.
Subscribe
Read More
celllphone image with blue light leak in top blocking out screen, insinuating social media issues with jurors
Article
Jan 9, 2026
Social Media Research on Prospective Jurors: Navigating Evolving Ethical Boundaries

As technology transforms what is possible in juror research, the gap between available tools and permissible practices continues to widen, particularly with respect to social media.

Read Now
lines of light making forward movement
Article
Dec 12, 2025
Wireless Litigation Trends at a Glance: Case Trends and Top Parties

Using aggregated filing data from the wireless dataset, we provide a data-driven view of where litigation is concentrated, which parties are most active, and how the structure of the wireless market shapes the legal landscape.

Read Now
black and white looking up at building from ground
Article
Dec 9, 2025
Why Jurisdiction Shapes What Testifying Experts Can Say Before and During Trial

State rules can dramatically alter what experts must disclose before trial and what they’re allowed to say during it. Let’s examine the spectrum of these guidelines and how they shift by location.

Read Now
looking up at a ceiling that are illuminated squares
Article
Nov 7, 2025
Know Your Fact-Finder: Not Just for Jury Trials

Research has shown that external variables can influence decision-making even for “objective” fact-finders. 

Read Now
financial ticker showing up and downward growth
Article
Oct 28, 2025
Cryptocurrency Litigation: Case Types, Segments, and Court Trends at a Glance

New data reveals how crypto disputes are playing out in courtrooms nationwide, as the fast-evolving industry faces growing legal accountability.

Read Now
a triangle pattern with dark shadows showing texture
Article
Sep 26, 2025
Key Takeaways from ALJ Johnson Hines’ Fireside Chat for ITCTLA

DOAR Director, Jeffrey Dorfman, recently attended ITCTLA's panel and procedure event and took note of ALJ Johnson Hines’s practical guidance.

Read Now
financial ticker showing upward growth
Article
Sep 24, 2025
Cryptocurrency Litigation: Parent Companies and Industry Segments at a Glance

Our latest deep dive focuses on crypto litigation an parent-company activity in federal district courts in the U.S..

Read Now
white pill dropped in water resulting in bubbles, black background
Article
Aug 18, 2025
Biologics Litigation: Administrative Judges, Key Players, and Patent Patterns at the PTAB

Across 192 biologics PTAB proceedings, a small group of APJs and repeat innovator and biosimilar companies accounts for much of the activity.

Read Now