Pacific Steel Group Awarded $110 Million in Damages in High-Stakes Antitrust Case

Antitrust | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Pacific Steel Group (PSG), a San Diego–based steel fabricator, brought antitrust claims against Commercial Metals Co. (CMC), alleging that CMC engaged in exclusionary conduct that prevented PSG from competing in the California steel rebar market. The case focused on CMC’s use of restrictive contractual arrangements that PSG argued unlawfully foreclosed competition and blocked the development of a new, state-of-the-art rebar production facility. The matter proceeded to a two-week jury trial in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

At trial, PSG presented evidence that CMC used its market position to impose exclusivity provisions that restricted competition within a defined geographic market, despite plans to shut down its own local operations. PSG argued that this conduct delayed market entry, stifled innovation, and caused substantial financial harm by preventing PSG from realizing anticipated cost savings and profits tied to its proposed micromill project. The jury agreed, finding CMC liable for multiple antitrust violations and awarding PSG significant damages.

DOAR supported PSG by providing graphics consulting and design and evidence presentation services throughout the trial. Working closely with counsel, DOAR developed clear visual materials to explain complex antitrust and damages issues and managed the courtroom presentation of exhibits and demonstratives. These efforts helped the jury understand PSG’s claims and reinforced the case narrative, contributing to the favorable verdict.

Visualizing Market Foreclosure and Competitive Harm

The graphics illustrate PSG’s antitrust case by visually connecting CMC’s conduct to market foreclosure and measurable delay. The geographic map highlights CMC micromill locations and the 500-mile exclusion zones that restricted where competitors could build, underscoring the limited regional market at issue. The process diagram explains the steel rebar production workflow, showing how PSG’s proposed micromill would have competed efficiently. The timeline demonstrates how CMC’s exclusivity agreement caused a 16-month delay, linking anticompetitive conduct to lost time, increased costs, and suppressed competition.