Heightened regulatory scrutiny, changing approval pathways, and complex product disputes have made a clear understanding of FDA processes essential in litigation. DOAR represents former professionals from the FDA who have shaped policy, led breakthrough initiatives, and navigated the intricate pathways of regulatory science, enabling them to serve as an FDA expert witness in matters involving the development, regulation, and commercialization of drugs, biologics, and medical devices.
Our network includes former agency officials and senior staff who understand the full regulatory lifecycle, ranging from clinical trials and FDA submissions through approval, post-market surveillance, manufacturing quality, and labeling. As regulatory affairs and FDA regulatory expert witnesses, they offer practical insight into how decisions are made inside the Food and Drug Administration and how those expectations apply to specific products and companies.
In matters involving product safety, clinical pharmacology, manufacturing practices, or promotional claims, our former FDA professionals provide clear, grounded testimony and analysis. Drawing on their experience as regulatory affairs specialists, they help legal teams analyze alleged regulatory failures, product safety issues, and marketing practices, and present complex FDA processes in terms that judges, juries, and regulators can readily understand.
Contact Us
We represent experts who are world-class academics, industry executives, and former government regulators who were carefully selected for their knowledge, experience, and ability to communicate effectively.
Expertise in FDA regulatory frameworks and internal practices, including how agency decisions are made, documented, and applied in specific matters.
Experience evaluating clinical trials and nonclinical studies for scientific rigor, safety and efficacy support, and relevance to regulatory or contractual obligations.
Knowledge of FDA approval routes, market exclusivity, and regulatory timelines, and how they affect competitive positioning and product strategy.
Focus on FDA risk management requirements and REMS programs, including design, implementation, and adherence to mitigation and monitoring obligations.
Insight into pharmacovigilance systems, adverse event reporting, and other post-market safety obligations that shape regulatory compliance and product risk.
Background in CMC requirements, GMP standards, and FDA inspections, assessing how manufacturing quality and process controls impact regulatory status and disputes.
Experience assessing FDA labeling requirements, promotional communications, and advertising practices, including claims substantiation and potential misbranding issues.
As technology transforms what is possible in juror research, the gap between available tools and permissible practices continues to widen, particularly with respect to social media.
Using aggregated filing data from the wireless dataset, we provide a data-driven view of where litigation is concentrated, which parties are most active, and how the structure of the wireless market shapes the legal landscape.
State rules can dramatically alter what experts must disclose before trial and what they’re allowed to say during it. Let’s examine the spectrum of these guidelines and how they shift by location.
Our latest ALJ report provides a comprehensive analysis of Administrative Law Judge Bryan Moore’s activity at the ITC.
DOAR is proud to have supported the plaintiffs and their counsel at Winston & Strawn LLP in this significant victory for immigrants whose civil rights and due process protections were violated.
Research has shown that external variables can influence decision-making even for “objective” fact-finders.
As Vice President, Experts, Hamilton will be responsible for executing and evolving the strategic vision of DOAR’s expert witness practice.
New data reveals how crypto disputes are playing out in courtrooms nationwide, as the fast-evolving industry faces growing legal accountability.