July 25, 2020 – New York, NY – DOAR, the nation’s leading trial consulting company, today released important findings from a new study that measured the perceived prevalence of discrimination and harassment in the workplace and the effects on jurors’ attitudes toward employment cases alleging the specific wrongdoings. The results indicate overwhelmingly that many factors come to bear—including political beliefs, personal experience, and the #MeToo movement—on how jurors will evaluate the context in which employment lawyers advance case themes on their clients’ behalf.

The study, “Implications for Litigating Employment Cases in a #MeToo World,” was conducted by the DOAR Research Center and is a follow-up report to its 2018 study on the topic.  The new study comes on the heels of a report by the New York State Bar Association regarding gender disparity in New York Courtrooms to which DOAR was proud to contribute.

“There are two overarching takeaways from this report and the report by the New York State Bar Association,” said Dr. Ellen Brickman, a Director at DOAR and lead author of the study. “We still have a long way to go regarding gender equality, including in the legal profession. And, while society has become more aware of the pervasive nature of all forms of discrimination and harassment, the issues surrounding them take on a polarizing effect.”

Key findings from the 2020 DOAR study include:

  • Discrimination and harassment remain highly relevant to the American public
  • Respondents estimate that at least one in every three Americans experiences each form of workplace bias (i.e., race, gender, and age)
  • Race plays a role in prevalence estimates and intersects with gender
  • Personal experience plays an important role in perceptions of how widespread unequal treatment is in the workplace
  • Many respondents think cases of discrimination and harassment are underreported
  • Political affiliation and gender are dividing lines with respect to prevalence estimates and attitudes

One critical finding from the study indicates that the political affiliation of a respondent strongly correlates with their perceptions of discrimination and harassment based on race and of gender-based harassment. Notably, the study revealed that twice as many Republicans as Democrats report a belief that the #MeToo movement has gone too far.

“Because sociopolitical attitudes play such a key role in employment disputes, engaging with subject matter experts early on will help attorneys better consider what case themes they present,” said Rachael Zichella, Director of Employment Litigation at DOAR and co-author of the DOAR Study. “Experts can help counsel not only retool their general approach to the case themes within the expert’s area of study, but also their discovery and information-gathering strategies.”

The 2020 study was administered to 1,000 people from the Los Angeles and New York metropolitan areas. Respondents were evenly split by gender, by whether they were under 45 or 45 and over, and by whether or not they were college graduates. Their ages ranged from 18 to 99.

Download the full report of the findings.

About DOAR

DOAR is the nation’s leading trial consulting company advising lawyers at top tier law firms and major corporations. We leverage our more than 30 years of experience to provide the insight, expertise, and support required to handle the most complex, high-stakes legal disputes. We stay at the forefront of the most impactful trends and technologies affecting the legal community and deliver valuable insight that informs and advances our clients’ litigation strategies.

For more information about DOAR, visit DOAR.com and follow us at @DOARlitigation.

 

Stay Informed
Stay up to date on our latest news and insights.
Subscribe
Read More
celllphone image with blue light leak in top blocking out screen, insinuating social media issues with jurors
Article
Jan 9, 2026
Social Media Research on Prospective Jurors: Navigating Evolving Ethical Boundaries

As technology transforms what is possible in juror research, the gap between available tools and permissible practices continues to widen, particularly with respect to social media.

Read Now
lines of light making forward movement
Article
Dec 12, 2025
Wireless Litigation Trends at a Glance: Case Trends and Top Parties

Using aggregated filing data from the wireless dataset, we provide a data-driven view of where litigation is concentrated, which parties are most active, and how the structure of the wireless market shapes the legal landscape.

Read Now
black and white looking up at building from ground
Article
Dec 9, 2025
Why Jurisdiction Shapes What Testifying Experts Can Say Before and During Trial

State rules can dramatically alter what experts must disclose before trial and what they’re allowed to say during it. Let’s examine the spectrum of these guidelines and how they shift by location.

Read Now
looking up at a ceiling that are illuminated squares
Article
Nov 7, 2025
Know Your Fact-Finder: Not Just for Jury Trials

Research has shown that external variables can influence decision-making even for “objective” fact-finders. 

Read Now
financial ticker showing up and downward growth
Article
Oct 28, 2025
Cryptocurrency Litigation: Case Types, Segments, and Court Trends at a Glance

New data reveals how crypto disputes are playing out in courtrooms nationwide, as the fast-evolving industry faces growing legal accountability.

Read Now
a triangle pattern with dark shadows showing texture
Article
Sep 26, 2025
Key Takeaways from ALJ Johnson Hines’ Fireside Chat for ITCTLA

DOAR Director, Jeffrey Dorfman, recently attended ITCTLA's panel and procedure event and took note of ALJ Johnson Hines’s practical guidance.

Read Now
financial ticker showing upward growth
Article
Sep 24, 2025
Cryptocurrency Litigation: Parent Companies and Industry Segments at a Glance

Our latest deep dive focuses on crypto litigation an parent-company activity in federal district courts in the U.S..

Read Now
white pill dropped in water resulting in bubbles, black background
Article
Aug 18, 2025
Biologics Litigation: Administrative Judges, Key Players, and Patent Patterns at the PTAB

Across 192 biologics PTAB proceedings, a small group of APJs and repeat innovator and biosimilar companies accounts for much of the activity.

Read Now