Article
May 29, 2019

The People Behind The Cases

In this article, Natalie Gordon reflects on former white-collar defendants’ experiences and the human impact of the criminal justice system.

I recently had the privilege of attending the NYC Bar Association’s 8th Annual White-Collar Crime Institute. Among the impressive panels was one titled “Former White-Collar Defendants Speak.” It was moving to hear four former defendants talk about their experiences with the criminal justice system.  Three had stood trial, and one spent time in prison before his conviction was overturned.

Their paths through the legal system varied considerably, but what stood out was their common experience of trauma. They described waves of despair and humiliation and moments of panic and utter desolation, especially as they talked about the impact of the experience on their loved ones. But, they also talked about the moments that gave them hope and comfort and helped them preserve their sense of dignity.  One panelist remembered that the judge always called him by name rather than “the defendant.” Another mentioned the importance of having his legal team be available to his family to answer questions. These may seem like little things to the rest of us but their impact can be stronger than we realize.

While the dehumanizing effects of trial – and the events leading up to it – are especially powerful for criminal defendants, civil litigants can feel them too. Their freedom may not be on the line but sometimes their business or their professional reputation is. Panels like the one at the WCC Institute are important reminders to us of the people behind the cases. It is our job not just to remember their humanity but to bring it to life for judges and juries. “The defendant” may not move people much but Mr. Litvak, Dr. Neumeister, Mr. Allen and Mr. Davis certainly moved me and many others who heard them speak.

 

Stay Informed
Stay up to date on our latest news and insights.
Subscribe
Read More
building with glass windows and sunset reflection
Article
Nov 2, 2026
Beyond Templates: Designing Demonstratives that Fit the Case, Audience, and Venue

While demonstratives have become a staple of modern litigation, more graphics do not necessarily create a more persuasive case. The most effective demonstratives begin with a clear understanding of the “why” behind each visual and are tailored to the specific practice area, target audience, and venue.

Read Now
close up of dark mode iphone social media apps
Article
Oct 23, 2026
Foreseeability, Causation, and the Future of Social Media Addiction Litigation

A series of significant outcomes is reshaping social media addiction litigation and the arguments future plaintiffs may pursue. As these cases evolve, courts and juries will continue to confront difficult questions about foreseeable risks, platform safeguards, and causation.

Read Now
blue faded lines on a black background, mimicking the look of veins
Article
Oct 13, 2026
Why Complex FDA Litigation Requires More Than Regulatory Experience

Selecting the right FDA expert requires more than identifying someone familiar with the FDA, as disputes require a precise understanding of how the Agency operates. According to Jeremy Scholem, a Director at DOAR who manages expert engagements in complex litigation, the expert’s experience should correspond to the relevant Center, product, regulatory pathway, and period at issue. Read his thoughts on the formation of our Former FDA Expert Team.

Read Now
glass texture with blue purple yellow coloring
Article
Oct 2, 2026
When AI is at the Center of a Dispute: Ten Strategic Considerations for Selecting AI Experts

Because AI encompasses a range of technologies and disciplines, the expertise needed will depend on the systems and technical questions at issue. Understanding those questions can be critical to identifying the right evidence, evaluating competing claims, and explaining complex technology to decision-makers.

Read Now
lights and hard edges coming to a point at the center of the image
Article
Sep 3, 2026
What Happens When AI Goes Off Script?

The next wave of AI litigation may not begin with a system that failed. It may begin with one that succeeded by pursuing its objective through actions no one intended or authorized.

Read Now
looking at the capitol building through a window in DC
Article
Aug 6, 2026
2026 ITC Midyear Update: Section 337 Trends and a Reshaped Commission

Halfway through 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is balancing an active Section 337 docket with meaningful changes in its leadership. Investigations continue to move on demanding schedules as the Commission welcomes new members and prepares for a change on its Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) bench.

Read Now
orange background painted with dark blue and black
Article
Jul 31, 2026
The ITC's Next ALJ: What the Search Says About the Future of Section 337 Investigations

The U.S. International Trade Commission is entering an important period of transition. Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) MaryJoan McNamara's planned departure has prompted the Commission to begin searching for her successor, while the Commission itself is also welcoming new leadership as the Senate advances a full slate of commissioner nominees.

Read Now
close up image of pages from a book
Article
Jul 22, 2026
Beyond the Prompt: AI, Expert Testimony, and a New Layer of Judicial Scrutiny

Artificial intelligence is no longer a theoretical issue in litigation. Law firms are developing AI policies, courts have issued guidance on attorney use of generative AI, and litigants are increasingly encountering AI-generated work during discovery. More recently, attention has begun to shift to another question: what happens when expert witnesses incorporate AI into their work?

Read Now