Article
Jan 26, 2023

DOAR Managing Director Andy Cepregi Takes High-Tech Trials to the Next Level

With more than 100 trials under his belt, Andy “Bunky” Cepregi is a trusted trial presentation consultant in complex, high-pressure matters.

Andy “Bunky” Cepregi is a well-known, respected trial presentation consultant through his 20+ years of work with many of the nation’s top trial lawyers. He has been the lead trial consultant in more than 100 trials, including bench and jury trials, arbitrations, and court-related hearings. He specializes in high-tech presentation strategies, courtroom technology, and the management and presentation of evidence.

Cepregi is particularly experienced in supporting trials in Delaware’s Chancery Courts and hearings at the International Trade Commission – two high-profile, fast-paced venues involving bet-the-company disputes.

For decades, he has led client engagements across the country, providing high-level strategic support across a wide range of cases, including white-collar criminal defense cases, complex commercial disputes, intellectual property disputes, and securities litigation. What’s most satisfying to him in his work is the collaboration and camaraderie among the trial team that results from working in high-pressure situations toward a common goal.

Cepregi offered the following three tips regarding evidence presentation:

  1. When possible, simplify – The old adage “less is more” rings true in complex litigation with numerous details and competing narratives. Make sure the evidence being presented supports the argument clearly and doesn’t bog down the attorney’s oral presentation.
  2. Know the case – Being in the “hot seat” requires a high level of diligence in understanding all the case materials and anticipating an attorney’s next steps as the trial unfolds.
  3. Rehearse, rehearse, rehearse – Being able to think on your feet is an important skill but not one to rely on. It’s critical to practice; timing can mean everything. A stumble here or there can undermine the credibility of the oral argument. Practicing will give you the upper hand if you need to pivot suddenly.

Cepregi said, “DOAR only works with the best attorneys in the business. They call us repeatedly because we are passionate about work, and they trust us to do whatever it takes to help them succeed.”

Regarding his extensive work in DE Chancery, he adds, “Chancery court cases are typically on a condensed timeline, sometimes having only 4-6 weeks between complaint and trial,” he states. “Many of the cases I’ve worked on are multi-billion dollar matters involving events making the headlines in real-time.”

“Bunky’s expertise in advising attorneys on the most effective presentation approaches for document-based evidence, videotaped testimony, and graphic demonstratives has earned him a reputation with clients as being one of the best trial presentation consultants in the country,” said DOAR President Scott Allen. “Many of them will not go to trial without him.”

Cepregi credits much of his success to being at DOAR for most of his career and to the company’s reputation for excellence. He adds that DOAR’s fully integrated business model of applying what is learned during jury research in developing the most persuasive and impactful trial presentations has allowed him to become a key member of the trial teams he supports.

“There’s often a lot of turnover in our industry, but not at DOAR,” Cepregi said. “All of our directors and many of our consultants have been at DOAR for 15 years or more. As a result, we all know how to best integrate jury research, graphics consulting, and trial presentation in support of a matter, and we will leverage each other’s strengths and expertise to help our clients achieve the best outcomes on their cases.”

Contact us to learn more about how DOAR can help you with your next matter.

 

Stay Informed
Stay up to date on our latest news and insights.
Subscribe
Read More
looking at the capitol building through a window in DC
Article
Aug 6, 2026
2026 ITC Midyear Update: Section 337 Trends and a Reshaped Commission

Halfway through 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is balancing an active Section 337 docket with meaningful changes in its leadership. Investigations continue to move on demanding schedules as the Commission welcomes new members and prepares for a change on its Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) bench.

Read Now
orange background painted with dark blue and black
Article
Jul 31, 2026
The ITC's Next ALJ: What the Search Says About the Future of Section 337 Investigations

The U.S. International Trade Commission is entering an important period of transition. Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) MaryJoan McNamara's planned departure has prompted the Commission to begin searching for her successor, while the Commission itself is also welcoming new leadership as the Senate advances a full slate of commissioner nominees.

Read Now
close up image of pages from a book
Article
Jul 22, 2026
Beyond the Prompt: AI, Expert Testimony, and a New Layer of Judicial Scrutiny

Artificial intelligence is no longer a theoretical issue in litigation. Law firms are developing AI policies, courts have issued guidance on attorney use of generative AI, and litigants are increasingly encountering AI-generated work during discovery. More recently, attention has begun to shift to another question: what happens when expert witnesses incorporate AI into their work?

Read Now
Article
Jul 17, 2026
Is Competition for Specialized Talent Driving More Trade Secret Disputes?

Companies are investing enormous resources into developing proprietary algorithms, manufacturing processes, engineering designs, training data, source code, and other confidential information that often cannot be protected through patents alone.

Read Now
blue and black texture wavey
Article
Jun 30, 2026
Investigations at the ITC: Navigating Speed and Complexity in a High-Stakes Forum

Success at the ITC depends not just on the legal merits, but on how effectively parties can organize technical complexity, align expert-driven narratives, and present a clear, disciplined case under significant time pressure. Let’s explore how venue nuances and current industry trends are impacting proceedings seen before the Commission.

Read Now
overhead view of cars speeding on road like blurs of light
Article
Jun 18, 2026
Who Gets the Blame? What Autonomous Vehicle Research Reveals About AI Litigation

Litigation surrounding autonomous vehicle technology raises a question that courts will increasingly confront as AI becomes more embedded in everyday life: when humans and machines share control, who gets the blame when something goes wrong?

Read Now
blue and black background with grain and texture
Article
Jun 9, 2026
What ITC Practitioners Should Know: Key Judicial Insights from ACI’s ITC Conference

To better understand evolving trends at the venue and hear directly from those involved in ITC litigation, DOAR proudly sponsored and attended the American Conference Institute’s annual ITC Litigation and Enforcement Conference.

Read Now
white and black triangle texture on washed out background
Article
Apr 20, 2026
AI Litigation Trends: Rapid Growth and Emerging Patterns

As generative AI technologies move from early adoption to widespread commercial use, litigation activity is accelerating in parallel. Our analysis of 168 district court cases highlights a sharp rise in filings, a high concentration among a small group of defendants, and early signals of how this legal landscape may evolve.

Read Now