Beyond the Prompt: AI, Expert Testimony, and a New Layer of Judicial Scrutiny
Artificial intelligence is no longer a theoretical issue in litigation. Law firms are developing AI policies, courts have issued guidance on attorney use of generative AI, and litigants are increasingly encountering AI-generated work during discovery. More recently, attention has begun to shift to another question: what happens when expert witnesses incorporate AI into their work?
Read NowIs Competition for Specialized Talent Driving More Trade Secret Disputes?
Companies are investing enormous resources into developing proprietary algorithms, manufacturing processes, engineering designs, training data, source code, and other confidential information that often cannot be protected through patents alone.
Read NowJury Delivers Record Verdict Against Online Ghost Gun Seller Husky Armory in Kentucky Teen’s Wrongful Death Lawsuit
The verdict, $4.2m in compensatory damages and $100m in punitive damages, sends a powerful message to the ghost gun industry.
Read NowInside AI: Perspectives from DOAR's AI Expert Team
To better understand where AI litigation is headed, we asked members of DOAR's AI Expert Team to share their perspectives on the disputes emerging today, the technical issues likely to shape future cases, and what organizations should be doing to prepare.
Read NowInvestigations at the ITC: Navigating Speed and Complexity in a High-Stakes Forum
Success at the ITC depends not just on the legal merits, but on how effectively parties can organize technical complexity, align expert-driven narratives, and present a clear, disciplined case under significant time pressure. Let’s explore how venue nuances and current industry trends are impacting proceedings seen before the Commission.
Read NowWhat the Murdaugh Jury Reversal Reveals About Juror Influence in High-Profile Trials
The South Carolina Supreme Court's decision to overturn Alex Murdaugh's murder convictions has reignited questions about juror impartiality, outside influence, and the safeguards courts use to ensure a fair trial. DOAR Director Chad Lackey, Ph.D. explains what the reversal means for attorneys, how juror bias is identified and addressed, and why a multi-faceted approach to jury selection remains critical in today's highly connected world.
Read NowDefense Prevails in High-Stakes Section 16(b) Securities Trial Seeking More Than $500 Million in Disgorgement
DOAR supported Empery Asset Management and Brio Capital in a Section 16(b) defense verdict involving Kartoon Studios.
Read NowWho Gets the Blame? What Autonomous Vehicle Research Reveals About AI Litigation
Litigation surrounding autonomous vehicle technology raises a question that courts will increasingly confront as AI becomes more embedded in everyday life: when humans and machines share control, who gets the blame when something goes wrong?
Read NowNearly $80 Million in Damages Awarded to Former Balboa Capital CEO in High-Stakes Contract Dispute Against Ameris Bank
A federal jury returned a sweeping victory in favor of former bank executive Patrick Byrne in his dispute against Ameris Bank.
Read NowNew DOAR Research Identifies Key Factors Shaping Liability Decisions in Civil Cases
Five-year analysis finds gender, socioeconomic status, and perceived case strength shape how jurors evaluate liability.
Read Now