Section 337 investigations before the U.S. International Trade Commission move quickly and center on complex patent and technology disputes. The compressed schedule and technical nature of these matters place significant emphasis on expert testimony and the ability to explain sophisticated technologies clearly before the Administrative Law Judge.
DOAR delivers leading testifying experts and trial consulting services that strengthen the presentation of complex technical and economic issues in ITC hearings. Our experts include highly credentialed engineers, scientists, and industry executives whose experience spans advanced technologies and life sciences sectors frequently at issue in Section 337 investigations.
Proven Experience at the ITC
DOAR has supported attorneys in Section 337 investigations for decades, working alongside leading law firms and in-house counsel in technically complex matters before the Commission. We understand the pace, procedural demands, and strategic pressures that define this forum.
A strong ITC strategy is not simply about presenting facts. It requires disciplined organization of complex records, alignment of expert analysis, and clear presentation of technical arguments under demanding timelines. DOAR provides the structure and execution that complex ITC matters require.
Patent disputes before the ITC frequently hinge on sophisticated engineering and scientific concepts. Our experts and trial strategy consultants provide a clear explanation of these technologies through expert testimony and demonstrative presentations, which can be critical to the Administrative Law Judge’s understanding of the issues.
Evidentiary hearings move quickly and involve extensive technical records. Our consultants deliver a disciplined presentation of expert testimony and supporting demonstratives to ensure complex issues are communicated clearly and efficiently during the hearing.
Many ITC investigations proceed alongside related actions in district court or before the PTAB. DOAR can support counsel in maintaining consistency across themes, demonstratives, and presentation strategy, helping ensure alignment of technical positions and evidentiary narratives across forums.
Our new in-depth judge report, ITC ALJ Spotlight: Chief Administrative Law Judge Clark Cheney, features expanded data and analysis of CALJ Cheney's activity at this specialized venue.
Halfway through 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is balancing an active Section 337 docket with meaningful changes in its leadership. Investigations continue to move on demanding schedules as the Commission welcomes new members and prepares for a change on its Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) bench.
The U.S. International Trade Commission is entering an important period of transition. Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) MaryJoan McNamara's planned departure has prompted the Commission to begin searching for her successor, while the Commission itself is also welcoming new leadership as the Senate advances a full slate of commissioner nominees.
Success at the ITC depends not just on the legal merits, but on how effectively parties can organize technical complexity, align expert-driven narratives, and present a clear, disciplined case under significant time pressure. Let’s explore how venue nuances and current industry trends are impacting proceedings seen before the Commission.
To better understand evolving trends at the venue and hear directly from those involved in ITC litigation, DOAR proudly sponsored and attended the American Conference Institute’s annual ITC Litigation and Enforcement Conference.
Our new in-depth judge report, ITC ALJ Spotlight: Administrative Law Judge Monica Bhattacharyya, features expanded data and analysis of ALJ Bhattacharyya’s activity at this specialized venue.
Our annual ITC report, 2025 in Review: Key ITC Insights, provides a comprehensive look at 2025's activities and trends at the ITC.
Our latest ALJ report provides a comprehensive analysis of Administrative Law Judge Bryan Moore’s activity at the ITC.