International Arbitration

A growing trend in international arbitrations (IA) has led to a record-setting caseload over the past year. Driven by the restrictions imposed by the pandemic and the nature of the proceedings that make virtual hearings well-suited, international arbitrations have quickly become a preferred method for resolving cross-border commercial disputes. In the future, international arbitrations are also likely to continue to be favored as a “greener” and more efficient alternative to achieve a settlement.

For decades, DOAR has supported arbitration hearings worldwide, including in Hong Kong, Toronto, London, Paris, Singapore, Mexico City, Moscow, and Copenhagen. In 2020, DOAR worked closely with the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to support the first remote hearings for both institutions.



DOAR understands and can cater to the uniqueness of international arbitrations, whether in-person or virtually. No matter the format, you can count on DOAR to be in lockstep with counsel and in control of the required technology.


At DOAR, we understand that international arbitrations depend on highly sophisticated evidence presentation. Our consultants are known in the industry as being the best—not only for their diligence but also for their savviness in managing the proceedings. They have expertise in organizing a repository of evidence and presenting deposition videos, interactive timelines, summary charts, and documentary evidence quickly and reliably.

Our Experience

  • 30+ Years in the Legal Industry

  • Supported 2000+ Trials, Hearings, Arbitrations, and Mediations

  • Advised 300+ Law Firms Worldwide

  • Experience in 15+ Countries

Our Work

  • Evidence Repository and Maintenance
  • Graphics Consulting and Design
  • 3D Design and Animation
  • Evidence Presentation Consulting
  • Remote and On-site Technical Support
  • Gosling v. Mauritius

    DOAR’s consulting team was proud to support Mauritius, represented in the proceedings by Foley Hoag LLP, with the development of graphics and evidence presentation during an international arbitration under the auspices of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). In a majority opinion, the tribunal rejected the claim brought by UK investors that challenged Mauritius’ protection of the first UNESCO World heritage site commemorating resistance against slavery.

  • BM Muhendislik ve insaat AS v United Arab Emirates

    BMEC, a construction company that performed land reclamation work in Abu Dhabi, filed a lawsuit against the United Arab Emirates (UAE) for breach of contract. The case bounced around the UAE legal system for over 16 years. DOAR was proud to support BMEC with the development of graphics and evidence presentation.

  • Metro de Lima Consortium v. Peru

    Representing the Republic of Peru, Foley Hoag LLP secured a victory in an ICSID claim concerning the design, construction, and operation of the underground metro line “Línea 2” in the city of Lima. DOAR was proud to assist the Foley Hoag legal team with the development of graphics and evidence presentation during the complex construction arbitration.

  • Al Rushaid v. National Oilwell Varco, Inc.

    In an international arbitration at the ICC in Paris, DOAR provided graphics and evidence presentation to support Al Rushaid Parker Drilling, Ltd. (ARPD) in a claim against National Oilwell Varco (NOV) that alleged NOV conspired with three corrupt ARPD employees to defraud the company in a kickback conspiracy. Our efforts aimed at discrediting expert witness statements and highlighting missed deadlines and a coverup scheme over time.

    The trial consultants trusted by the nation’s leading trial lawyers.